In the methodology used, errors may be inherent in several steps performed. For instance, the original observed flow data were converted from stage height to discharge, assuming steady-state flow conditions. Additionally, the slope of the rivers extracted from a digital elevation model was averaged and does not account for sinks and waterfalls along the river course. Furthermore, the calculation of travel time using hydrographs, the approximation of hydraulic radius, the roughness coefficient, and slope extraction from the digital elevation model might introduce additional uncertainty.
It was assumed that the reaches used in this study were uniform. However, the three reaches used (Klip and the Mooi Rivers) have varying widths and cross-sections, and they meander while having different vegetation cover within the reach. The discharge is related to channel dimensions using empirical formulae developed for different river conditions. Furthermore, the linearity assumption of the Muskingum-Cunge method along the river reach might introduce additional errors in computed hydrographs.
Considering the above assumptions made in routing floods in ungauged catchments, the following recommendations are proposed: